Crazy America. esp re ‘black/white’

Here’s an article from this week’s Takimag about ‘race relations’ in the USA. It points out how insane they are with examples such as George Floyd being deified from a totally false conception of who he was and what happened to him while statues of Lincoln are torn down to appease.

All about black/white. But in fact it is not about black/white. Is it? There’s thousands and thousands of black skinned people in the USA that this all doesn’t apply to.

It is ‘african americans’ and – maybe – ‘anglo saxon americans’ isn’t it? I’m not sure about the ‘anglo-saxon’ but I rather think so. The ‘afa’s’ are not animose against the latino americans or the native americans , for instance, I think? Or the asian americans . Are they?

No matter. The point is the african americans. they are the problem, the trouble.

It seems. And for the press – the presumably white press – to keep referring to them as ‘blacks’ is to rob other races of their own rights, to submerge them in this disgraceful narrative.

And that seems to me to point to the hidden ‘elephant in the room’ here all the time: it’s all the doing of the whites. Though it’s not so hidden. Various times I’ve read various people point it out. For a long time. Most recently at the time of the Portland riots.

Whites at all levels. Down on the streets there rioting, in the universities corrupting, distorting and crippling education with false biases, in the courts and city councils. Everywhere.

We should be very much more aware of this I think.

Lord Sumption Said It All Back in March.

He summed up the situation way back then and since then no improvement – only worse. I think. Right? Or wrong? You see some improvement? You see some evidence that the threat is, after all, really large enough to warrant the death of a nation ? Let me know.

“I mean the tradition of policing in this country is that policemen are citizens in uniform they are not members of a disciplined hierarchy operating just at the government’s command. “

Exactly. Police are meant to be, in our tradition as I see it, citizens first and foremost. Not ‘arms of an authority that stands over us’. The latter is certainly what they were in the days of the formation of Australia.

But arguably, I suppose, not so in the England they came from. For though it may look like the police were decidedly the oppressors and mere ‘weapons’ of a brutal governing regime in fact the ‘Peelers’ of Robert Peel and early forces were clearly much desired by and much cooperated with by the citizenry because of the increasingly dangerous lawlessness.

This grew into perhaps the kindest era of British history at the end of the second world war when peace descended on the land, largely and the ‘british bobby’ became that placid and helpful reassuring figure strolling his beat with his admonitions ‘ello, ello, what’s going on ‘ere then?’

One has thought that our current police forces grow out of that ethos and in fact their publicity seeks to make that impression while their buildings, their arms, their uniforms and their conduct point in a different direction.

Point towards and American model of gun and brute force loving machismo, swagger, overwhelming force and clear and wide separation between the police and everyone, anyone else being as they’re claimed to be ‘officers of the law’ and serving this inhuman abstraction ‘the law’ which ‘service’ apparently gives them the right to break any and all laws at will.

Yes. So Lord Sumption’s remarks are very fitting. On a daily basis. Should be breakfast reading for many.

This is youtube vid but really there’s only a still photo to look at – the thing is really an audio recording. But it is good.

Any Sensible Truth Anywhere, I Wonder?

This is a good man to follow…. throws up a lot of sensible information. I’ve seen these vaccine data before. Somewhat incredible I thought.

Read somewhere that in fact the incidence of severe illness is so low with covid that it could (considering practicalities of collecting a sample group + a placebo group) be theoretically impossible to test a vaccine for efficacy on severe illness – whatever results you get always inevitably falling within the margin of error.

But on this ‘scientific’ evidence they are going to spend billions in Australia alone (I’m guessing it would get up to billions wouldn’t it? Exorbitant cost you can bet, just for the (incompletely, improperly tested according to tradition) vaccine plus immense cost of incredible refrigeration, plus transport, plus injection plus administration overheads – plus repeat it all in a couple of weeks! That’s not going to be peanuts. On top of the incredible costs already incurred.

But that’s not all. ‘Measures’ must be maintained during this period. They say. So the madness can continue.


USA Deaths Not Above Norm. Masks NO Good.

What more can a person do? Here, this one about Deaths Not Above Norm:

Looks like virtually no one can be bothered to read even information that could save their jobs, their health, their freedom, even their lives – so I’ll put an extract first in the hope of whetting appetite for reading and digesting. This would be of the essence of this report – a very authoritative report using ‘official’ figures:

“These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”

now read on to see how this possibly be:

And this about Masks, complete with copious references:

I’ll give you the conclusion first, encourage you to get into it:

By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle.

In an absence of knowledge, governments should not make policies that have a hypothetical potential to cause harm. The government has an onus barrier before it instigates a broad social-engineering intervention, or allows corporations to exploit fear-based sentiments.

Furthermore, individuals should know that there is no known benefit arising from wearing a mask in a viral respiratory illness epidemic, and that scientific studies have shown that any benefit must be residually small, compared to other and determinative factors.,to%20be%20transmitted%20by%20droplets%20and%20aerosol%20particles.

All of the above is totally damning of our govts draconian measures to the extent where they can only be accused of malice. None of the above is difficult for them to find and know.

Large chunks of it are common sense.

But it doesn’t matter a damn if people want to be sheeple. If you want to be locked up like a dog in its kennel and only allowed out with a muzzle and not allowed to play with the other dogs or touch them…..

if that’s what you want… you’ve got it and you’re promised more in the future on precisely the same pretext as this lot..

but if it is not what you want then bug your elected reps – bug anyone’s elected reps… bug all elected reps… and bug any authority figure at all for they have a say… from policemen through council officials to power and water meter inspectors….

tell them all: ‘Stop it.’

We are free.

We will meet the virus in a sensible way, without this crippling insanity.

Why Lockdowns Can Never Work.

Because a lockdown is a freezing in place of people. And that’s death.

A 100% lockdown would kill everyone so it can’t be.

Any amount of lockdown is some amount of death. Total lockdown is total death.

So it is a balancing act. Lockdown ‘death’ or covid ‘death’

And it should be noted that both these ‘deaths’ are a mixed bag of things, not just convenient body bag dead people but a mixture of human suffering of all kinds and indirect as well as direct and immediate and future.

Both covid and the lockdown ‘death’ are of this nature and arguments based on pure body bad deaths are sophistry of the first order – and that’s before we get anywhere near investigating the reliability of the statistics or decoding the meaning of the labels.

So from the beginning and constantly, all the time, first and foremost, should always be a measuring of both sides in order to accomplish the balancing act, decide where the balance is.

A supremely important thing requiring quite some effort.

Exactly what Generals do during the course of their campaigns – measure costs against progress.

This has wholly, completely, utterly not been done, not been seen to be done, not been done.

This ‘war’ has been conducted without any concern whatever for measuring cost against benefit.

Nobody knows if at any given time we’re ‘killing’ ourselves more than the virus would have killed us.

And that is the condemnation of all who’ve lent their support no matter how large or small to this lockdown death strategy. The utter condemnation. The total failure of responsibility.

When we consider all the evidence it seems more and more clear that the covid ‘deaths’ are much, much less than the ‘freeze in place’ death but it wouldn’t matter if the situation were reversed the point is there’s a correct way to conduct such a campaign, certain tasks needing to be undertaken and it hasn’t been followed, t

hose things have not been done.

In a country like Australia with virtually no virus at all then when the whole country locks down because some virus was spotted in one place then it is obvious that a massive percentage of that lockdown was wasted, did nothing, was useless.

It was done ‘in case’. i.e the idea is that you don’t know where the virus is spreading to – someone might be carrying it and they could wander off to absolutely anywhere and you don’t know.

So because of that one person the whole nation freezes in place. And the ‘dying’ begins.

Now that needs looking in terms of probability, doesn’t it? What is the probability of someone traveling to each different area from the last known site of infection?

And from there what is the probability of a serious outbreak in those places if that traveler did go there?

And from there finally what is the probable ‘death cost’ in that area?

And weigh that again a calculated ‘lockdowndeath’ for that area.

i.e. – does it rationally pay to have that place locked down?

And note all of the above is assuming there is some benefit. You can say it’s giving the ‘benefit of the doubt’ to those who support lockdowns and mask mandates.

If that’s true then that’s fine and we should proceed as above.

But we are not proceeding as above.

And in fact the situation is far worse because in fact lockdowns and mask mandates simply do not work, do nothing to prevent the spread of the disease as is demonstrated over and over here there and everywhere.

Most recently (dec 20) here:

So there is no ‘cost benefit’ – there’s only cost. Only Cost !!

How do lockdowns and mask work in Australia you say? Because there is no Covid in Australia. That’s why. They don’t work in Australia any more than they work anywhere else. They don’t stop spread if it is spreading.

But if it doesn’t exist it doesn’t spread. And that’s the situation.

Being an island nation in quarantine – and in summertime – every time it got in they jumped on it quick with a total lockdown costing the usual horrific cost but stamping the thing out before it could get started.

You can do that. Stop it getting a start. And that’s what Australia is fiercely dedicated to doing. Stopping it ever getting a start.

But once it does get a start then lockdowns and masks won’t make a difference.

Lockdowns do work – to help isolate and quarantine a few cases if you’re lucky. And willing to sacrifice everything.

But a real epidemic, a real contagion. No. They don’t work.

Australia is in the habit of going to far extremes and total lockdowns on the rumour of an outbreak. What is going to happen when a real outbreak happens? When the virus really is widely present in the community as every year flu is for instance or (corona virus) common cold?

What are they going to do then? ‘Total lockdown’ the whole nation?

They’ve got no other choice. They leave themselves no other options. They are totally dedicated to this procedure. It is their only strategy.

And will it come? It is certain to come. It will exist on planet earth for the foreseeable future, mutating constantly. It will come.

And then they plan to destroy what’s left of the nation after this current destruction.

Where what’s the option? Natural human fighting of the virus, that’s what. Letting good health and nature battle the thing as has been the way since the dawn of humankind.

And everything seems to indicate that Vitamin D is the simple ‘magic bullet’ that will bring your immune system up to par so’s it can conduct and win this fight.

Ep104 – Vitamin D and Viral Special with Dr. David Grimes et al – Vital Viewing!